Review – Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

bvsBack in 1986, as Superman star Christopher Reeve was prepping work on the ill-fated Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, he approached the writer of Superman I and II, the late, great Tom Mankiewicz, for advice. Reeve pitched Mankiewicz on his idea for Superman to rid the world of nuclear weapons, a parallel to real-world social issues of the time. Mankiewicz replied with this advice:

Don’t ever get involved with something Superman could fix. He could disarm the world in fifteen minutes. He doesn’t have to go to the UN. If he feels that strongly about it, he could get rid of all the missiles. Superman could feed the world if he wanted to. He could establish agricultural fields in outer space. Don’t bring up things like that.

I would like to add an addendum to that. Don’t get Superman directly involved with real-world issues. Do not twist his mission of peace into a political struggle. Do not bog him down with the ugliness of reality, the superfluity of man’s government, or the problems of democracy, especially at the expense of his message of hope, of inspiring the best in humanity.

I write this, because my many concerns over the past few years with director Zack Snyder’s approach to Batman v Superman were finally realized last month. Not only has the filmmaker indulged in all the above missteps, he’s delivered the most vile, morally reprehensible depiction of Superman and DC Comics on film to date. The film is a brutal assault on our senses, on the spirituality and idealism of these characters, on our intelligence as moviegoers, and on the vitality of quality filmmaking in big-budget studio tentpoles. It’s not just a disappointment; it’s a resolute misstep for the future of the DC Universe on film.

The film centers on a middle-aged Bruce Wayne (Ben Affleck getting first billing in a long history of big actors being billed before the guy playing Superman) who after witnessing Superman (Henry Cavill) and General Zod topple one of his company’s buildings at the end of Manbatman-v-superman of Steel two years ago, grows weary of such dangerous forces being left unchecked.  Rather than blaming the indulgences of the director in the previous film, we are to blame Superman for Metropolis’ destruction. Bruce’s fear is shared by a great deal of the public, who endlessly debate Superman’s heroics and the fact that he “answers to nobody.” Bruce returns to Gotham City plotting to neutralize, and kill if necessary, the Man of Steel, despite repeated claims by butler Alfred (Jeremy Irons) that “he is not our enemy.” “That son of a bitch brought the war to us!” replies Bruce. Blah blah post-9/11 themes.

Back in Metropolis, Clark Kent is living comfortably with fellow Daily Planet staffer Lois Lane (Amy Adams). I guess Lois knowing Clark’s secret identity from the get-go at the end of Man of Steel hasn’t yielded any interesting twists on their decades-long will they/won’t they relationship from the comics. Contrastingly, Superman has been entirely anti-social in public, saving the world yet not really interacting with it in any way beyond that for these two years. Meanwhile, wealthy philanthropist Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg) plots to acquire the recently-discovered Kryptonite to control Superman, by manipulating a senator (Holly Hunter) and indeed everyone else around him. Oh, and there’s also other DC characters like Wonder Woman (Gal Godot) lying in the wait for the eventual Justice League movie.

It’s an overflowing plot, but there are traces of intrigue. Chris Terrio of Argo fame uses the characters as players in a larger piece about terrorism, power, corruption, and security, the groundwork of an intriguing political thriller. It is critical of heroes like Batman and Superman, examining their failings and the real consequences of their actions. It’s also a huge deviation from the reverence Snyder and his Man of Steel team showed for the universe in that film. In part to blame is perhaps the director’s long-standing love of Frank Miller’s seminal 1986 graphic novel The Dark Knight Returns; Snyder carts over that story’s older, world-wearier Batman, some talking-head-style political commentary, and perhaps intentionally or not, Miller’s own disdain for the Last Son of Krypton.

Indeed, Dawn of Justice continues the tradition of recent Superman media by placing the hero in no-win scenarios that go directly against the winning spirit the character has always been about. There is a scene wherein (avoiding spoilers) Superman enters a building and a bomb goes off, and Superman just watches somberly as everyone around him is vaporized. Uh, Zack? This is Superman. Not Doctor Manhattan.

That’s an issue I had with Man of Steel too, though to a lesser extent. The Superman mythology isn’t about “well, what if he were REAL? What if a humanoid that had all these powers came to earth?” I don’t care how the real world reacts to Superman’s presence. That’s not appealing to me. Superman is about fantasy, he’s an ESCAPE from the real world. He’s a guy flying around in a red cape who makes a difference in his community and inspires those Batman-V-Superman-Trailer-Fight-Heat-Visionaround him to pitch in themselves. Why is there debate about whether or not he’s doing the right thing? We KNOW he’s gonna do the right thing. He’s SUPERMAN. And yet here we are, watching Charlie Rose and Neil DeGrasse-Tyson (both make brief appearances) debate about a Superman that exists and whether or not his power should be checked. But this is a Superman that hasn’t even begun to build bridges with people publically, so he’s clearly failed in his mission. The Superman of the comics won people over with a smile and a wave as he flew above them. Pity Henry Cavill’s Superman isn’t allowed such joy, regulated to stand and mope idly about how people don’t understand him.

As for Ben Affleck’s Batman, he busies himself in these ridiculous, jarring dream sequences reflecting his fear of aliens from the sky. I had hope after one such sequence, wherein a bat-creature bursts from the tomb of Martha Wayne to attack him. It recalls the jump-scares of a horror movie, a cool new twist that might really transport audiences into Bruce’s tortured psyche. Yet the movie never goes anywhere with it, taking us into even more absurd (and immodestly-budgeted) nightmares, one of which is a full, unabashed teaser for the Justice League movie. Pity Affleck, who’s been suckered into this mess with the promise of redemption after the indignity of 2003’s Daredevil. The actor/filmmaker isn’t altogether unfitting in the cape and cowl, but is also far from the finest performer to fill it.

But I digress. After characters have waxed poetic enough, director Snyder yanks the film’s breaks and yells, “less talk, more EXPLOSIONS!” All political discussions or reflections on real-world politics (clumsy as they were) are gone, leaving all its ideas entirely unresolved, lost in Snyder’s blaring self-indulgence and Junkie XL and Hans Zimmer’s blatant, blaring, borderline parodical score. What of Scoot McNairy’s legless homeless guy? Why has Amy Adams’ role been all but reduced to damsel-in-distress? Shouldn’t Clark be getting in trouble every time Perry White (Lawrence Fishburne) passes by his empty desk? No answers here, we only have enough time left in the already bloated two-and-a-half hour runtime for the movie to live up to its namesake – the bout between Batman and Superman.

And…it sucks. Not only does Snyder fail to build up their conflict in any meaningful way, their fisticuffs aren’t satisfying, nor are they really even warranted in the context of the film. It’s seriously the weakest explanation for pitting these two characters against each other. And it was at this point in the movie, after suddenly becoming aware of the intense grimace on my face, I wondered, “aren’t I supposed to be having fun?”

Apparently not. There’s actually a really ugly undercurrent to Dawn of Justice, boasting such brutality, such bloodlust, such hyper-machismo bullshit that makes for the most uncomfortable, punishing experience. That’s not just during the title fight too, that’s the whole movie. Snyder and his cinematographer Larry Fong absolutely do not know when to stop with the hypermasculinity, when enough is enough, to the point where one starts to feel ashamed at being a man at all. It’s more than enough to build a case accusing Snyder, who also shoots the death of Bruce’s parents with all the slow motion and heavy breathing of a sex scene, of using DC Comics characters to work through his own crippling manhood issues.

The studio is even prepping an R-rated cut of this movie for home video release. That’s right, your favorite childhood comic book characters have been perverted into a movie that, without certain cuts, was deemed too violent and too intense by anyone under 17 years old. Wow.batman-v-superman-the-complete-guide-to-frank-miller-dark-knight

So inevitably, we know Batman and Superman are to resolve their differences at some point. And after all that thirst for blood, all that shoddy build-up, their altercation is capped off in the most mind-bogglingly stupid, overwhelmingly left-field conclusion, that literally any idea you, the audience, could come up with as to why these characters should stop fighting, will better qualify you to write this movie than the filmmakers being paid hundreds of thousands to do so.

And then they’re friends, as if nothing had happened, teaming up to destroy an even more laughably stupid threat. And if you thought this film would be answering for Man of Steel’s destructive climax, you’d be wrong, wrong, wrong. Batman v Superman doubles down on the needlessly high body count. In fact, in one scene Batman has the big baddie in a totally isolated area, but rather than returning to the city to bring the necessary tools to kill the baddie to him, he actually draws him BACK INTO THE POPULATED CITY to get HIM to the tools. Remember how Christopher Nolan’s Batman had that one rule about killing people? Apparently Zack Snyder doesn’t share that sentiment.

So we finally realize, Batman v Superman is a movie about uncomfortable extremes. Snyder has always been an overwrought mess of a filmmaker, favoring style over substance, but the responsibility of pitting together two beloved DC characters has done nothing to curb his sadist, ear-rapingly obnoxious hard-on for destruction. What the hell? Doesn’t this go against everything DC Comics characters have stood for the past 70 years? You bet. Both Batman and Superman are acting totally out of character here. Batman’s a crazy, single-minded bruiser who brands criminals and wants nothing short of Superman’s death, while Superman is totally willing to bend his own moral code if his family is threatened. In the comics, the two have had their quarrels, occasionally even violent ones, but they have never, ever been pushed to the point of foaming at the mouth, hungering for each other’s head on a spike like in this movie. Pity the children who have to witness such overt brutality by the hands of characters who should, ideally, be serving as their role models.

And again, pretty much all the problems posed by the movie would’ve been solved immediately had Superman simply TALKED OPENLY. A simple, “Bruce, we’re being played!” would’ve stopped the title fight altogether. And every single other problem of the movie could’ve been completely avoided had Superman simply stood up in front of the public after Man of Steel and been like, “Hey guys, my name’s Superman, I’m just here to help out with the problems you can’t solve yourselves and really just help everyone to do better. Sorry about that Zod character, he’s a bad guy on my home planet, and I was just trying to stop him. Next time we face a threat like this, I’ll do it in space or something so there’s not as many casualties. Again sorry, still new to the whole superhero thing. Anyway, up up and away and all that!” *woosh*

Boom. /conflict.

Even the other DC characters teased in this movie lack subtlety; they basically appear in mini-trailers for their upcoming solo movies. It’s a sad day when I’m longing for the more natural, thoughtful teases of Green Lantern.

I haven’t even mentioned Jesse Eisenberg, who gives the most abysmally misguided performance as Lex Luthor. Eisenberg, known for his mousy-yet-charming teenage characters in Adventureland and _1436830197Zombieland, is not only insanely miscast as the powerful billionaire, he’s clearly never even glimpsed a Superman comic long enough to know who this character is supposed to be. So he instead plays Luthor the only way he knows how – by going over-the-top awkward, hammy, and creepy, his hands shaking as he speaks about power at a charity event, stumbling over the girth of his words. There’s even a point at the end where he actually hums the notes of the musical score. It’s just uncomfortable, a lot like…well, Zack Snyder’s id – angry, unrestrained, bratty, unlikable, and sadistic.

And that’s pretty much Batman v Superman too, the Donald Trump of superhero movies – loud, blunt, ugly, stupid, fear-mongering, extremist, tasteless, and bearing several cringe-worthy teases of what’s to come. Zack Snyder was always the wrong architect for the DC Universe on film, merely a loud, annoying kid bashing his action figures together. I don’t think Tom Mankiewicz could’ve envisioned anything like it, but if he could see Dawn of Justice now, there is no doubt he’d be shaking his head, collecting his valuables, and leaving the theater. I’d be right behind him.

3.5/10

 

QUOTE: Rossen, Jake; Millar, Mark (2008-02-01). Superman vs. Hollywood: How Fiendish Producers, Devious Directors, and Warring Writers Grounded an American Icon (Cappella Books) (p. 164). Chicago Review Press. Kindle Edition.

IMAGES: cinemablend.com, mirror.co.uk, screenrant.com, cdn.idigitaltimes.com, i.ytimg.com

Advertisements

Small Rifts, Max-imum Wonder: San Diego Comic-Con 2014 (Day Three)

comic-con_logoHey guys, sorry I’m late with this post. Balancing passion with paid work is never an easy task…very much appreciate the patience!

 

WB Pictures

Getting the surprises out of the way first, Zack Snyder entered to premiere a quick teaser for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, and bring out the three primary cast members, Henry Cavill, Ben Affleck, and Gal Gadot as Supes, Bats, and Wonder Woman respectively. The footage has already leaked online, featuring a Batman wearing heavy Dark Knight Returns-style armor and Superman flying above, eyes flashing red with heat vision. The look of Wonder Woman was also revealed, pictured left.

The WW costume is about what most of us were picturing, I suppose. Not much left to say other than I’m just as excited as I was before this and very much looking forward to the team-up.

Jupiter Ascending was next, a film which I’m interested in, yet weary over after the Wachowskis’ pretentious, overindulgent Cloud Atlas. Following that film came Mad Max: Fury Road, finally debuting footage after a nearly two-year shooting block and an even longer development period. Director George Miller took the stage for his first Con, describing the film as an, “imaginary friend. Popped into [my] head and wouldn’t leave.” Miller went on to say the film would largely be one big chase sequence with minimal dialogue, and gave him, “a chance to return to simple allegory of first film.” Footage screened at the Con can be viewed below:

That’s a Mad Max movie alright, though I’ve never been particularly passionate about the franchise myself. The first film is my least favorite of the bunch; I find it dark and ugly, almost Grindhouse-esque. I much prefer the  down-to-earth, human, story-driven nature of Road Warrior and Beyond Thunderdome. Give me story over stunts any day.

Still, check out some fantastic storyboards for the film at BleedingCool, which I’m sure will be published as a comic book or something during the film’s release next year.

I unfortunately had to skimp on The Hobbit: The Battle of The Five Armies panel, moderated by Stephen Colbert. It’s a film I have no doubt will be as epic and emotional a conclusion as director Peter Jackson’s five other Middle-Earth ventures.

 

Legendary Pictures

Ended up missing this panel as well. Still, it was exciting to hear of Chris Hemsworth and director Michael Mann, making his first Con appearance, showcasing Black Hat, previously known as the Untitled Cyber Thriller, which they’ve been working on for a few years now. Guillermo Del Toro was also on call to promote Crimson Peak, the director’s latest R-rated horror venture which sounds for more promising than Pacific Rim. For Warcraft, director Duncan Jones appeared to promote the film, which is reportedly an origin story detailing the origins of battling the Orcs. Also announced was a King Kong spinoff of sorts titled Skull Island. Interesting stuff all around.

 

A Dame to Kill For

While I followed this panel, I don’t really have much to say on the film itself just yet. The film comes out in a month, I’m eagerly awaiting it, however (minor spoilers)…we STILL don’t know if Clive Owen will make a cameo in the third act of the title storyline as Dwight post-face operation. You’d think this would be the sort of thing they’d reveal at Comic-Con, despite the spoiler potential. I want to know, dammit!

 

Marvel Studios

Ant-Man-Comic-Con-2014-Exclusive-Poster

Ironically enough, looming large over Marvel’s festivities this year was the Edgar Wright Ant-Man debacle, yet fans didn’t seem to care much as Marvel played the crowd like a fiddle, showing footage from Phases 1 and 2 to kick off their panel. They certainly do like tooting their own horn, even undeservedly, yet perhaps sadder is the fact that people still eat up even the company’s weakest efforts.

Perhaps wanting to get it out of the way first (and unsurprisingly fielding no fan questions), the cast and new director of Ant-Man took the stage first, revealing as rumored that Evangeline Lily would be playing Hank Pym’s daughter Hope Van Dyne in the film. Attempting to better tie director Peyton Reed to the project, Feige eagerly showcased a hand-drawn promo from an amateur rock band Reed played in in the late 80s. The promo was a riff on the cover of Avengers #1 with band members standing in for the heroes; Reed stood in for Ant-Man, in what is I guess a pretty interesting coincidence. Still, it’s a pretty fleeting way of trying to brush past Edgar Wright’s huge commitment to the project in favor of Reed’s.

More promising was Rudd’s physique, clearly just looking at his neck shows he’s been hitting the gym hard for the role of Scott Lang. And Michael Douglas seemed earnestly enjoying his tenure there, speaking of Tales to Astonish and Hank Pym’s background. Marvel also screened some early test footage featuring of Lang running along a table and leaping onto a flying ant.

I shared my thoughts on the new direction of the production a month or so ago, but since then a lot of the anger seems to have cooled based on producer Kevin Feige’s comments that the production really did come down to creative differences. Feige also poked fun at the notion of the “big, bad studio,” and maintained the film in its current state was the, “best version of Ant-Man.” According to who? The studio? More importantly, who’s to say this isn’t complete PR bullshit, the studio’s “official” account of the story, put out there in order to dodge such questions at Comic-Con? If the split between Wright and Marvel was really as amicable as Feige paints it to be, then why did Wright tweet the ultra-somber photo of Buster Keaton, famously cheated by MGM, and title it “selfie?”

There is another side to this story – Wright’s. Feige has said nothing to deconfirm what the trades initially reported, that the studio had gone over Wright’s head and commissioned inferior rewrites of the script. Whether or not Wright “wasn’t used to the collaboration,” is irrelevant, more Feige vindicating of himself and the studio than a subjective recount of the dispute. Regardless, I’m still shaking my head at Marvel, Feige, and all involved who led to Wright divorcing himself from his own work.

There was a bit more fun to be had at the Age of Ultron panel, which included all major players sans Joss Whedon, who’d been undergoing knee surgery. Also introduced was Josh Brolin as Thanos, the sole surprise of the evening after screening some early footage of the film.

 

WB TV

Though I’ve already shared by thoughts on both Flash and Constantine here, the WB TV panel, moderated by Arrow’s Stephen Amell, shared some new details about the four new and current DC shows. For one, an extended trailer revealed that Ra’s Al Ghul will, predictably, be the primary third season villain on Arrow. Fine by me – while Arrow is a show highly derivative of Nolan’s Batman, frequently contains silly plot twists (Sarah’s bisexual?! MY GOD!!), and is generally entirely manufactured drama, at it’s core it’s a solid, entertaining hero’s journey.

I haven’t said a lot about Gotham because there really isn’t much to talk about there. It looks decent, I’m looking forward to seeing where they take the story, but there’s only so many places you can take a series like this without drawing it out and/or deviating heavily from the source material like Smallville did. I’m really just hoping for cameos from past Bat-family like Adam West or Chris O’Donnell.

Check back soon for my final wrap-up of the ceremonies!